So the whole logic is clear, first of all, this friend lists all kinds of conflicts in human countries and districts. The Human Trafficking Link then directly describes human nations and districts as a kind of superficially light existence, but in reality one is darker than the other. If you use your brain to read the entire article, you will know that except for a few dark examples that actually happened, the entire article uses the word "or" throughout. In other words, it means "could", "perhaps" and "could". , but the word "or" is very magical, if you just pull it out alone, you will directly miss a little sad and innocent feeling, which is "Tomorrow it may rain in the human country." " It's a very uncertain statement, but if you don't think about it carefully, the subconscious mind just erases and selects it and it becomes "Tomorrow it will rain in the states and counties of humans", but if you change "or" to “may”, it becomes “Tomorrow it may rain in human states and counties”, then the whole article will not cause ambiguity so big.